How to Control Malaria

by

QUESTION

Suggestions to control malaria?

ANSWER

This answer is copied from an earlier question asking about strategies for controlling malaria in Africa. The methods below are being used by many health ministries, international agencies and non-governmental organisations to combat malaria all over the world (and not just in Africa).

Currently, malaria control is based on a combination of prevention, education, research and treatment. In more detail:

Prevention: This is arguably one of the keys to sustainably reducing malaria burdens and even eliminating infections. Central to this goal has been the distribution of long-lasting insecticide treated bednets, which prevent people from being bitten by infected mosquitoes while they sleep at night. Unfortunately, some recent research has just been published which suggests that bednets might be contributing to insecticide resistance in mosquitoes, as well as increased rates of malaria in adults due to decreasing natural immunity. As such, it may be that more research is needed in order to determine the most effective and efficient ways of using bednets to prevent malaria infection, particularly in high-risk groups like young children and pregnant women. Another arm of prevention is reducing the number of mosquitoes in an area (called vector control), and thus preventing transmission from occurring at all – this can be achieved through insecticide spraying but also filling in the stagnant pools of water that mosquitoes lay their eggs in. Vector control was highly successful in reducing malaria transmission in the United States and Mediterranean in the years after World War II.

Education: Through education, people living in at-risk areas for malaria transmission can learn about ways to prevent the disease, as well as what to do if they suspect they are infected. Similarly, education is important for travellers visiting malarial areas, so they know the best ways in which to avoid being infected.

Research: Understanding the distribution, factors affecting transmission and the development of new strategies for control and treatment is going to be crucial in the fight against malaria, and particularly in high-burden areas such as Africa. Similarly, scientists are busily looking for new compounds to treat malaria, as well as the ever-elusive malaria vaccine. If such a vaccine could be developed, it would be a huge step forward in the fight against malaria; recently, a study was published which reported the results of the first Phase 3 clinical trial of a malaria vaccine, in African children. The vaccine appeared to confer approximately a 50% level of protection against malaria; while this is a start, it perhaps did not live up to many people’s hopes of a new method for controlling malaria.

Treatment: Hand in hand with treatment comes diagnosis; if a person can have their infection easily, accurately and cheaply diagnosed, then they will be able to access effective treatment more rapidly, thus improving their chances of a swift recovery. As such, countries in Africa are working hard to provide health systems capable of local diagnosis and availability of treatment, so that people don’t have to travel far to have their infections cured.

Taken together, these four strategies are having some success even in the world’s poorest and most malaria-endemic regions, especially in decreasing the number of malaria deaths. Decreasing the overall number of infections will be yet a greater challenge, but one which the world, especially through commitment to the Millenium Development Goals, is dedicated to overcoming.

 

 

Malaria Month

by

QUESTION

What is the national month for malaria?

ANSWER

I’m not exactly sure I understand your question. If you are asking if there is a specific month when malaria is the worst, that depends on where you are. Malaria transmission is highly seasonal, because the mosquitoes that transmit the disease require pools of standing water in order to reproduce. Therefore in many places, transmission is highest during the rainy or wet season.

However, if you mean if there is a specific month dedicated to raising awareness about malaria and control, then the answer is yes, at least for certain countries. India, for example, has declared each June between 2005 and 2012 to be “Anti-malaria Month,” when a big push is made nation-wide to educate people about preventing malaria, implement early diagnosis and treatment and organise vector control efforts. June was selected as it is the month before the start of the monsoon season, when malaria transmission increases due to the heavy rains.

Malaria Eradication and Water Quality

by

QUESTION:

How will the eradication process of the mosquito larva influence the quality of the water?

ANSWER:

That’s a very interesting question. The answer is that it depends a lot on the way in which the mosquito larva are controlled. The usual, traditional method is through the application of insecticides. Many of these are known to have severe negative effects on water quality, particularly through being non-selectively toxic and therefore killing lots of other aquatic life as well as the mosquitoes. Moreover, some are known for their effects on animals further up the foodchain; the most famous example of this being DDT, which was used to kill adult mosquitoes. It was discovered that this pesticide resulted in birds laying eggs that had very thin shells, preventing the chicks from hatching successfully. As such, it was banned in most developed countries. Modern insecticides used for mosquito larva reduction have been developed to target mosquitoes specifically; a popular one in the USA is methoprene, which interferes with the mosquitoes’ growth hormones, preventing development into adults. Microbial compounds, which are not dangerous to other organisms, are also sometimes used.

Another approach is through the use of natural enemies of the mosquito larvae, notably certain species of fish and dragonflies. These will eat mosquito larvae and pupae, thus naturally reducing numbers, and with little undue effect on water quality (although in some contexts, such as reservoir water, there may be concerns with stocking the water source with large numbers of fish).

Malaria in Southern United States

by

QUESTION:

Why is there not a prevalence of malaria in the southern United States when we are bitten almost daily by the “little beasts?”

ANSWER:

Malaria once was relatively common in the southern United States. Transmission used to be possible due to the favorable climatic conditions for the development both of the mosquito as well as the malaria parasite. Huge advances in the control and treatment of malaria were made directly as a result of increased interest in the disease after the US occupation of Cuba and the building of the Panama Canal in the early years of the 20th century. This vastly reduced the number of cases of the disease, but the final, concerted effort to eradicate malaria came in the 1940s.

This was due to a federal public health program called the National Malaria Eradication Program (NMEP), and as a result of its actions, malaria transmission was halted throughout the United States by 1951. The program was launched in 1947, coordinated by the newly formed Communicable Disease Center (now the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC) and mostly involved reducing the number of mosquitoes in and around people’s homes. This was done through the wide-spread spraying of DDT—during the years of NMEP, it has been estimated that more than 6.5 million homes were sprayed with the insecticide. Alongside spraying, mosquito breeding habitats were also removed, through wetland drainage, and human monitoring and treatment efforts were stepped up. By 1949, malaria was no longer considered a disease of public health importance, and it was declared eradicated from the United States in 1951.

Having said that, the species of mosquito that transmit malaria still exist in the USA, and particularly in the southern states, which means that there is always a risk of small, localized outbreaks of the disease, particularly during hot and wet seasons.

Climate change may also increase the zones where malaria is at risk of being able to develop within the United States. For this reason, the CDC continually monitors the small number of cases reported each year in the USA (there were about 1500 cases in 2007—all but four of these cases, however, were the result of travelers to malarial areas outside of the USA bringing the disease back with them) to ensure that they are prepared and well-informed should an outbreak arise.