Drug Resistance May Make Malaria Parasite Less Resistant to Other Substances

Malaria parasites that develop resistance to the most effective class of anti-malarial drugs may become susceptible to other treatments as a result. The discovery could reveal potential new drug options, which would be essential in the event of resistance to the best anti-malarials.

In a new study, researchers have shown how the anti-malarials artemisinins attack the malaria parasite by inhibiting the action of a crucial protein, and that genetic mutations in this protein can reduce the effect of the drugs. While demonstrating this, however, they also discovered that a mutation that gives the parasite resistance to artemisinins makes it more sensitive to attack by another substance, cyclopiazonic acid (CPA). CPA is thought to be too toxic to be a suitable anti-malarial treatment, but the findings suggest it could be worth pursuing derivatives of the acid as treatment options.

The study was led by researchers at St George’s, University of London and has been published in The Journal of Infectious Diseases.

The artemisinin group of drugs are the most effective and widely used treatments for malaria – used most powerfully with other drugs as artemisinin-based combination therapies – but little is known about their mechanism of action on the malaria parasite. There are signs that the malaria parasite is developing resistance to artemisinin-based combination therapies, meaning further understanding of the drugs could be crucial to prevent them becoming obsolete.

The St George’s researchers have now demonstrated that artemisinins work by acting on a protein within the parasite called a calcium pump. Calcium is essential for all living organisms as it is needed for vital cellular processes. The calcium pump regulates calcium levels in cells, and if it is not functioning properly the parasite dies.

In previous studies, the team had witnessed the same effect on the calcium pump in genetically engineered malaria parasites. However, in these studies the parasites’ sensitivity to artemisinins fluctuated, so they did not give a clear indication of the drugs’ mechanism of action and the findings could not be confirmed.

To provide more consistent results, the latest study used yeast cells instead of parasite cells. Yeast can be a convenient way to display and test the function of proteins from other organisms.

After confirming that artemisinins inhibited the calcium pump in the yeast model, the researchers mutated the pump to mimic three mutations previously observed to give parasites resistance to the drugs. When they did this, they saw similar resistance.

Following this, they tested whether these mutations had any effect on the action of another five substances known to have an anti-malarial effect. They found that one particular mutation that gave the pump resistance to artemisinins made it more susceptible to CPA.

Their findings also showed that the yeast model could be used to identify other drugs that harm the parasite.

Lead author Professor Sanjeev Krishna said: “CPA is a compound used in science and not in clinical practice in any way. However, it points to a proof of concept that we can look for weaknesses in the more resistant strains of the parasite. The yeast model provides a convenient and reliable method to study anti-malarials and this particular mechanism of resistance to them.”

He added: “This new research supports our earlier work suggesting that the calcium pump is crucial for artemisinins’ action. Understanding how this lifesaving drug works on this calcium pump and how the pump can develop drug resistance will not only allow us to better understand how to use artemisinins more effectively, but it will help us contribute to the development of new drugs to counter the potentially serious effects of artemisinin resistance.”

Source: St George’s, University of London

The full journal article, “Expression in Yeast Links Field Polymorphisms in PfATP6 to in Vitro Artemisinin Resistance and Identifies New Inhibitor Classes’, is available at The Journal of Infectious Diseases.

Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Papua New Guinean Infants Exposed to Plasmodium falciparum and P. Vivax

Intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) has been shown in randomized trials to reduce malaria-related morbidity in African infants living in areas of high Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) transmission. It remains unclear whether IPTi is an appropriate prevention strategy in non-African settings or those co-endemic for P. vivax (Pv).

Methods and Findings

In this study, 1,121 Papua New Guinean infants were enrolled into a three-arm placebo-controlled randomized trial and assigned to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) (25 mg/kg and 1.25 mg/kg) plus amodiaquine (AQ) (10 mg/kg, 3 d, n = 374), SP plus artesunate (AS) (4 mg/kg, 3 d, n = 374), or placebo (n = 373), given at 3, 6, 9 and 12 mo. Both participants and study teams were blinded to treatment allocation. The primary end point was protective efficacy (PE) against all episodes of clinical malaria from 3 to 15 mo of age. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. The PE (compared to placebo) against clinical malaria episodes (caused by all species) was 29% (95% CI, 10–43, p≤0.001) in children receiving SP-AQ and 12% (95% CI, −11 to 30, p = 0.12) in those receiving SP-AS. Efficacy was higher against Pf than Pv. In the SP-AQ group, Pf incidence was 35% (95% CI, 9–54, p = 0.012) and Pv incidence was 23% (95% CI, 0–41, p = 0.048) lower than in the placebo group. IPTi with SP-AS protected only against Pf episodes (PE = 31%, 95% CI, 4–51, p = 0.027), not against Pv episodes (PE = 6%, 95% CI, −24 to 26, p = 0.759). Number of observed adverse events/serious adverse events did not differ between treatment arms (p>0.55). None of the serious adverse events were thought to be treatment-related, and the vomiting rate was low in both treatment groups (1.4%–2.0%). No rebound in malaria morbidity was observed for 6 mo following the intervention.

Conclusions

IPTi using a long half-life drug combination is efficacious for the prevention of malaria and anemia in infants living in a region highly endemic for both Pf and Pv.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00285662

Please see later full article for the Editors’ Summary (link below).

Citation: Senn N, Rarau P, Stanisic DI, Robinson L, Barnadas C, et al. (2012) Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Papua New Guinean Infants Exposed to Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS Med 9(3): e1001195. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001195

Academic Editor: Sanjeev Krishna, St George’s Hospital Medical School, United Kingdom

Received: July 5, 2011; Accepted: February 9, 2012; Published: March 27, 2012

Funding: This work was supported by a grant to the PNG Institute of Medical Research from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Health Program (Grand ID# 34678). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This work was made possible through Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support and Australian Government NHMRC IRIISS.

Competing interests: SJR is a member of the PLoS Medicine Editorial Board. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; AQ, amodiaquine; AS, artesunate; ATP, according to protocol; EPI, Expanded Programme on Immunization; Hb, hemoglobin; IPT, intermittent preventive treatment; IPTi, intermittent preventive treatment in infants; IRR, incidence rate ratio; LDR-FMA, ligase detection reaction/fluorescent microsphere assay; mITT, modified intention to treat; PE, protective efficacy; Pf, Plasmodium falciparum ; PNG, Papua New Guinea; Pv, Plasmodium vivax ; PYAR, person-year at risk; SAE, serious adverse event; SP, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

Authors: Nicolas Senn1,2,3,4#, Patricia Rarau1#, Danielle I. Stanisic1,5, Leanne Robinson1,5, Céline Barnadas1,5, Doris Manong1, Mary Salib1, Jonah Iga1, Nandao Tarongka1, Serej Ley1, Anna Rosanas-Urgell1, John J. Aponte6, Peter A. Zimmerman7, James G. Beeson5,8, Louis Schofield5, Peter Siba1, Stephen J. Rogerson2, John C. Reeder8, Ivo Mueller1,5,6*

1 Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Madang, Papua New Guinea, 2 Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne Australia, 3 Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland, 4 University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 5 Infection and Immunity Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia, 6 Barcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), Barcelona, Spain, 7 Center for Global Health and Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America, 8 Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia

Full Article:Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Papua New Guinean Infants Exposed to Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax: A Randomized Controlled Trial (PDF)

Source: PLOS Medicine

Copyright: © 2012 Senn et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.