Malaria and Employees

by

QUESTION

I have a domestic employee that has malaria. I also have a 1 year old baby at home. Is it safe to keep her in employ or should I grant her leave until she is fully recovered?

ANSWER

Malaria cannot be transmitted between people directly. It is transmitted via the bite of an infected mosquito. As such, the only way your baby could get malaria from your employee is if a mosquito bit the employee, then directly bit your infant. Therefore, the best way to prevent transmission of malaria in this case is to make sure both your employee and your child sleep under long-lasting insecticide treated bednets.

You should also make sure your windows and doors are screened, to prevent the entry of mosquitoes that could carry malaria. These mosquitoes feed mainly at night and in the evenings and early mornings, so during these times, you should take extra precautions against getting bitten, such as wearing long sleeved clothing and covering exposed skin in insect repellent. If you have air conditioning, having this on at night can also prevent mosquitoes from entering rooms. You should also make sure your employee gets appropriate treatment for malaria and takes the full course of medication.

Repeated Malaria Cases, New Guinea

by

QUESTION

Hello, I live in Papua New Guinea. Myself, my wife and my 2 kids (both under 4 years old), get diagnosed with malaria approximately 3-4 times a year, usually vivax or falciparum. Our GP uses a prick of blood and examines under a microscope. Is it that easy/obvious to diagnose under this method and is it common to get this many attacks in a year? I also fear the affects of taking malaria tabs (eg Fansidar, Primaquin, Artemeter, Amodiaquine) this many times, especially for my young kids. Please help!

ANSWER

In high transmission areas, particularly in rural areas in sub-Saharan Africa, it certainly isn’t unusual for children to get as many a 5 or 6 malaria attacks in a year; adults tend to present with fewer clinical episodes, usually because they were heavily exposed as children and thus developed a significant level of immunity against malaria.

If you and your wife didn’t grow up in a malarial area, then you would not have that acquired immunity, and so you would be expected to get sick almost as often as your young children. Papua New Guinea certainly is a high transmission zone, and I think one thing which might help your family is to focus more on malaria prevention. Since malaria is transmitted by mosquitoes, the best way to avoid getting malaria is to avoid getting bitten by mosquitoes. You should all be sleeping under log-lasting insecticide-treated bednets, which kill and/or repel mosquitoes that try to bite you while you sleep (the mosquitoes that transmit malaria, of the genus Anopheles, are most active at dusk, at night, and at dawn—during the heat of the day they usually don’t feed, but may be found in cooler, heavily shaded areas).

You could also try spraying the walls of your house with a long-lasting insecticide like permethrin, which will also kill adult mosquitoes. Making sure your house is well-screened will also prevent mosquitoes from getting in and biting you at night and in the evenings, and if you are going out during these times, you and your family should wear long-sleeved clothing, and exposed skin should be covered with insect repellent. A DEET-based insect repellent is best, but you may not be comfortable using these regularly on young children, since it can have some potentially dangerous long-term effects, particularly on the liver.

In terms of your other questions, looking at your blood under the microscope is the normal way to diagnose malaria in many places, so it sounds like your GP is doing a good job. There is no indication of adverse effects from taking multiple, repeated doses of anti-malarials, but as I mention above, taking additional preventive measures may further help in reducing your family’s malaria incidence.

One thing you might want to talk to your doctor about is the fact that in some cases, Plasmodium vivax can cause relapses of infection weeks or even months after the initial infection. The reason is that P. vivax can form dormant life stages, which can hide out in the liver, and cannot be killed by the normal anti-malarial treatment. However, there is a medication, called primaquine, which can kill these liver forms, and prevent future relapse. People with a deficiency in a particular enzyme, called G6DP, may not be able to take this medication, as it may cause severe anaemia, so prior to taking the drug you might have to be tested for this deficiency. However, it is definitely something you should talk to your GP about.

Please take a moment to complete our Malaria Survey, as it will help us better understand the effects of malaria medications.

Malaria in Kitwe Zambia

by

QUESTION

Is it dangerous for my children two years old in Kitwe?

ANSWER

Kitwe has been part of the Roll Back Malaria campaign to control malaria in Zambia—the program has been very successful, reducing deaths by malaria by over 65% nationwide. However, there still is a risk of contracting malaria in most parts of the country, and so preventative measures should be taken when visiting or living in Kitwe, such as sleeping under a long-lasting insecticide treated bednet, wearing long-sleeved clothing in the evening and at night and screening doors and windows to prevent mosquitoes from entering.

Persistent Antibodies to Malaria?

by

QUESTION

I had malaria as child, more than 30 years ago. It was successfully treated with no relapse. I have since travelled to malaria- endemic countries, but the last time was over 3 years ago. No symptoms. I recently donated blood and routine screening has detected malaria antibodies. How long do the antibodies persist?

ANSWER

Based on your experience, I would say at least three years! While I doubt your antibodies would persist since your infection as a child, it is more likely that in your more recent trips to malarial areas you have been re-exposed to the parasite, but for whatever reason, the infection didn’t progress into a full-blown episode of malaria. This could well be due to some residual immunity from childhood, or you just received a light enough infection that your general immune system was able to fight off. Either way, this would have produced new antibodies against malaria, which were picked up by the blood screen.

The length of time antibodies persist is important information in the control of malaria, since serological tests (which detect antibodies) can be used for screening of populations in low-transmission environments, but their efficacy is reduced in locations where people have been treated for malaria but their antibodies persist. Also, understanding how antibodies are created and maintained in the body is necessary for gaining an appreciation of how preventive measures, such as bednets, might potentially leave populations more vulnerable to malaria later on, through lack of acquired immunity.

US Army Doctor William Crawford Gorgas: Sent to Panama to fight Malaria

by

QUESTION

What was the doctor’s name who was sent to Panama to fight Malaria when Panama Canal was being built?

ANSWER

I believe the person you are referring to is Dr. William Crawford Gorgas. Dr Gorgas was the chief sanitary officer for the Panama Canal project and had gained experience in controlling vector borne diseases while working in Havana, Cuba, where yellow fever was a problem.

It had also been shown a few years earlier, in 1898, that mosquitoes carried malaria as well. In Panama, Dr Gorgas focused his efforts on controlling mosquitoes, through drainage of standing water, adding larvicide and oil to remaining water and hand-collection of adult mosquitoes. In addition, Dr Gorgas screened all government buildings and workers’ quarters to prevent mosquitoes from entering, and gave workers prophylactic quinine. He was assisted in these endeavours by Dr Joseph Augustin LePrince and Dr Samuel Taylor Darling; together, their efforts led to the elimination of yellow fever from the canal zone and a great decrease in the number of malaria cases, though malaria continued to be a problem throughout the construction of the Panama Canal.

Screening Mosquito House Entry Points as a Potential Method for Integrated Control of Malaria

by

Partial mosquito-proofing of houses with screens and ceilings has the potential to reduce indoor densities of malaria mosquitoes. We wish to measure whether it will also reduce indoor densities of vectors of neglected tropical diseases.

Methodology: The main house entry points preferred by anopheline and culicine vectors were determined through controlled experiments using specially designed experimental huts and village houses in Lupiro village, southern Tanzania. The benefit of screening different entry points (eaves, windows and doors) using PVC-coated fibre glass netting material in terms of reduced indoor densities of mosquitoes was evaluated compared to the control.

Findings: 23,027 mosquitoes were caught with CDC light traps; 77.9% (17,929) were Anopheles gambiae sensu lato, of which 66.2% were An. arabiensis and 33.8% An. gambiae sensu stricto. The remainder comprised 0.2% (50) An. funestus, 10.2% (2359) Culex spp. and 11.6% (2664) Mansonia spp. Screening eaves reduced densities of Anopheles gambiae s. l. (Relative ratio (RR) = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.84, 0.98; P = 0.01); Mansonia africana (RR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.26, 0.76; P<0.001) and Mansonia uniformis (RR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.25, 0.56; P<0.001) but not Culex quinquefasciatus, Cx. univittatus or Cx. theileri. Numbers of these species were reduced by screening windows and doors but this was not significant.

Significance: This study confirms that across Africa, screening eaves protects households against important mosquito vectors of filariasis, Rift Valley Fever and O’Nyong nyong as well as malaria. While full house screening is required to exclude Culex species mosquitoes, screening of eaves alone or fitting ceilings has considerable potential for integrated control of other vectors of filariasis, arbovirus and malaria.

Author Summary: Mosquito vectors that transmit filariasis and several arboviruses such as Rift Valley Fever, Chikungunya and O’Nyong nyong as well as malaria co-occur across tropical Africa. These diseases are co-endemic in most rural African countries where they are transmitted by the same mosquito vectors. The only control measure currently in widespread use is mass drug administration for filariasis. In this study, we used controlled experiments to evaluate the benefit of screening the main mosquito entry points into houses, namely, eaves, windows and doors.

This study aims to illustrate the potential of screening specific house openings with the intention of preventing endophagic mosquitoes from entering houses and thus reducing contact between humans and vectors of neglected tropical diseases. This study confirms that while full house screening is effective for reducing indoor densities of Culex spp. mosquitoes, screening of eaves alone has a great potential for integrated control of neglected tropical diseases and malaria.

Citation: Ogoma SB, Lweitoijera DW, Ngonyani H, Furer B, Russell TL, et al. (2010) Screening Mosquito House Entry Points as a Potential Method for Integrated Control of Endophagic Filariasis, Arbovirus and Malaria Vectors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4(8): e773. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000773

Editor: Neal D. E. Alexander, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom

Funding: SBO was supported by a scholarship kindly provided by Valent Bioscience Corporation. This study was also supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the United States Agency for International Development through the U.S. President’s Malaria Initiative (Award Number 621-A-00-08-0007-00), the Addessium Foundation (Reenwijk, The Netherlands) and a Research Career Development Fellowship (076806) provided to GFK by the Wellcome Trust. The funders of this study had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Copyright: © 2010 Ogoma et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

More information: Full text: Screening Mosquito House Entry Points as a Potential Method for Integrated Control of Endophagic Filariasis, Arbovirus and Malaria Vectors (PDF)