What does the goverment do to help malaria?

by

QUESTION

Does the goverment help malaria?

ANSWER

Many governments around the world assist in controlling malaria. Some countries, like Australia and the United States, used to have malaria transmission occur within their own borders, but through dedicated control programs, have managed to eradicate the disease locally. In these cases, the government coordinated huge programs of draining standing water, spraying insecticides and ensuring that health clinics were equipped to diagnose and quickly treat any human cases.

Nowadays, the governments of the US and Australia, along with many other countries which do not have malaria, still assist in the fight against malaria by funding malaria control programs in other countries, either directly (for example, the US funds international health projects through the US Agency for International Development) or indirectly, through international organisations like the World Health Organisation and the Global Fund for HIV, TB and Malaria. They also provide training in technical expertise to scientists, doctors and clinicians from malaria-endemic countries.

The governments of countries which have malaria are also deeply engaged in fighting the disease, mostly through their respective Ministries of Health, which often have specific malaria departments. In India, for example, malaria control is carried out by the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP), which is part of the Directorate General of Health Services. The NVBDCP carries out a multi-pronged strategy to combat malaria, including early case detection and treatment, vector control (with spraying, biological control and personal protection), community participation, etc. In Uganda, the Malaria Control Programme also carries out the above activities, and also provides intermittent preventative treatment against malaria for young children and pregnant women and has in the past engaged in large-scale distribution of long-lasting insecticide treated bednets. Both countries also explicitly include monitoring and evaluation as part of their control strategies, to make sure that any interventions or control efforts they make are having a positive impact on reducing malaria morbidity and mortality.

Malaria Outbreaks

by

QUESTION

What is the largest outbreak in the world from malaria?

ANSWER

Most parts of the world don’t suffer from malaria “outbreaks” in the traditional sense of the world. Instead, malaria is “endemic,” which means that transmission is on-going all of the time. In some cases, transmission is seasonal, but each year’s level of disease incidence is similar to the next year’s. Having said this, despite no major and obvious “outbreaks” malaria has probably killed more people in history than any other disease.

Outbreaks of malaria do occur in places where malaria is not usually found, though these are usually small and isolated. For example, while Jamaica was previously malaria free, an outbreak in 2006/2007 resulted in 370 cases. By the end of 2007, it had been declared malaria-free once more, as transmission was interrupted. In 2002, a man with Plasmodium vivax caused an outbreak among 10 fellow campers at a camp site in Northern Queensland, Australia. In the US in 2008, almost a thousand cases of malaria were reported, though most of those were imported cases from travellers who had recently returned from malaria endemic areas, and therefore did not get infected within the US.

Is there malaria in North America?

by

QUESTION:

Are there malaria-infected mosquitoes in North America?

ANSWER:

North America is usually defined as including Canada, the United States and Mexico. Of these, Mexico has known regions of regular malaria transmission; specifically the regions bordering Guatemala and Belize in the south (Chiapas, Quintana Roo and Tabasco), rural areas in the tropical lowlands slightly further north (parts of Oaxaca, Nayarit and Sinaloa) and a very localised section of northern Mexico, located across the states of Chihuahua, Sonora and Durango. Travellers to these areas are recommended to take measures to prevent against malaria infection, such as minimising mosquito bites or taking prophylactic medication. Both P. falciparum and P. vivax are known to be transmitted in Mexico, so you should consult with a travel physician before deciding which form of preventative (prophylactic) medication to take, depending on the length of your stay, your budget and the type of malaria most commonly found in the area to which you are travelling.

Malaria was once also widespread in the southern USA, though a concerted public health campaign that started in 1947 (mainly consisting of reducing the number of mosquitoes through insecticide spraying and control of stagnant water bodies) greatly reduced transmission and led to the disease being considered eliminated by the 1950s. Occasionally, small pockets of transmission will be reported, though stringent diagnosis and treatment quickly places these outbreaks under control once more.

However, there are additional cases of malarial mosquitoes occasionally also reported even from northern parts of the United States and Canada; these are when mosquitoes are accidentally transported from malarial regions, for example in airplanes, in luggage or in shipping containers. These mosquitoes almost never transmit the disease to people, and in most temperate regions, do not live long enough to be a public health threat or to enable the persistance of the disease.

Malaria in Southern United States

by

QUESTION:

Why is there not a prevalence of malaria in the southern United States when we are bitten almost daily by the “little beasts?”

ANSWER:

Malaria once was relatively common in the southern United States. Transmission used to be possible due to the favorable climatic conditions for the development both of the mosquito as well as the malaria parasite. Huge advances in the control and treatment of malaria were made directly as a result of increased interest in the disease after the US occupation of Cuba and the building of the Panama Canal in the early years of the 20th century. This vastly reduced the number of cases of the disease, but the final, concerted effort to eradicate malaria came in the 1940s.

This was due to a federal public health program called the National Malaria Eradication Program (NMEP), and as a result of its actions, malaria transmission was halted throughout the United States by 1951. The program was launched in 1947, coordinated by the newly formed Communicable Disease Center (now the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC) and mostly involved reducing the number of mosquitoes in and around people’s homes. This was done through the wide-spread spraying of DDT—during the years of NMEP, it has been estimated that more than 6.5 million homes were sprayed with the insecticide. Alongside spraying, mosquito breeding habitats were also removed, through wetland drainage, and human monitoring and treatment efforts were stepped up. By 1949, malaria was no longer considered a disease of public health importance, and it was declared eradicated from the United States in 1951.

Having said that, the species of mosquito that transmit malaria still exist in the USA, and particularly in the southern states, which means that there is always a risk of small, localized outbreaks of the disease, particularly during hot and wet seasons.

Climate change may also increase the zones where malaria is at risk of being able to develop within the United States. For this reason, the CDC continually monitors the small number of cases reported each year in the USA (there were about 1500 cases in 2007—all but four of these cases, however, were the result of travelers to malarial areas outside of the USA bringing the disease back with them) to ensure that they are prepared and well-informed should an outbreak arise.